Corker gets requested revision and votes for Senate GOP tax bill; Alexander involved with Obamacare deal

The Senate Budget Committee voted to advance the GOP tax reform bill on Tuesday on a party-line vote, with both Sens. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) backing the measure a day after threatening to withhold their support, reports Politico.  That critical vote came after President Donald Trump came to Capitol Hill to rally the troops in the tax battle.

Johnson voted for the tax bill after a back-and-forth with Trump during the lunch, according to multiple sources, over the Wisconsin Republican’s main concern: that the proposal currently gives more benefits to corporations than to businesses that pay taxes through the individual system.

… Corker, one of the fiscal hawks concerned about the deficit impact of tax cuts, said he was satisfied with details for a “trigger” to reverse tax cuts if economic growth fell short of projections in years to come. He expects details to be released Thursday.

“I’ve got details but I want to get it all sort of put to bed,” before disclosing them, he told reporters. “It’s an agreement in principle, a very strong agreement, with [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell, with [the] Finance Committee, and of course the White House has been in the midst of all this too.”

The agreement was primarily brokered between Corker and Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), a member of the tax-writing Finance Committee, according to one GOP source. The two key lawmakers struck an agreement in September on the overall price tag for the Senate plan, $1.5 trillion.

Corker has also been working on the trigger idea with Sens. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.).

Corker said he believed there was a viable workaround if a trigger violated budget rules of the Senate that Republicans plan to use to pass their tax bill along party lines.

… The tax bill includes a repeal of Obamacare’s individual mandate that everyone carry health insurance, and Collins told reporters Tuesday afternoon that Trump committed to backing a stabilization measure from Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.), as well as a bill from her and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) to protect pre-existing conditions and use high-risk pools.

The commitments from the president came in a separate meeting with Collins, Alexander and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Collins said.

… Corker and other fiscal hawks have become increasingly vocal about their concerns that the bill might fall short of paying for itself, as its chief backers claim.

“If we could take the entire individual side of this, throw it in the trash can and take it directly to the incinerator, I would be thrilled,” Corker said on CNBC. “But I’m willing to swallow the individual side, which to me is not what it needs to be, to get the business side as long as we’re not increasing deficits.”

And the addition of the health care battle has further complicated matters. Top Democratic senators have said that every member of their 48-person caucus supports the stabilization measure, but that calculus is sure to change if Republicans are using the Alexander-Murray deal to try and mitigate the impact of repealing the individual mandate.

The Corker press release statement:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), a member of the Senate Budget Committee, today released the following statement after voting to advance tax reform legislation to the Senate floor for consideration.

“After agreeing in principle with Senate leadership, members of the finance committee, and the administration on a trigger mechanism to ensure greater fiscal responsibility should economic growth estimates not be realized, I voted today to advance this important piece of legislation,” said Corker. “While we are still working to finalize the details, I am encouraged by our discussions.”

6 Responses to Corker gets requested revision and votes for Senate GOP tax bill; Alexander involved with Obamacare deal

  • Leslie Parsley says:

    Sickening. How can these duplicitous blowhards even look at themselves in their mirrors?

  • Pat Tabor says:

    Corker’s words tell all the difference in being a Republican and being a Democrat. It states he will sacrifice the individual side to get the business side done. This total Republican control of our government is showing in these words. Individuals don’t count, only corporate profits. Until we get the voters to realize this and vote these huskers out of Washington and the State houses the individual will never count except where they can help the rich.

  • old woman voter says:

    My concern is that if the deficits blow up, the answer will be to cut Social Security and Medicare.

  • Michael Lottman says:

    This entire bill is a joke, affecting vitally important economic and other interests without a moment’s non-political thought’s being given to what is actually needed, what harms the bill will set loose, and the people and vital programs that will be hurt or killed. There is just a necessity to pass a bill, any bill, so Trump can say he kept his “promise,” which is a joke in any case. What “promise”? Who can tell any more? And what are the promises of a president who knows not of what he speaks worth anyway?

  • John G. Stewart says:

    Shame on you, Bob Corker, for coming up with some nonsensical “trigger” fig leaf as a way to mask the massive impact on the U.S. deficit while preserving the outrageous tax benefits that will flow to the very wealthiest Americans–Donald Trump and his family leading the way–and doing nothing to reduce the negative tax consequences for millions of Americans. A billion dollar windfall for The Donald and a kick in the pants to seniors, people in poor health, students, teachers, and small business persons who will see their taxes increase. What a miserable, shameful performance.

  • Tab says:

    The deficit is not a revenue problem that Corker and so many “deficit hawks” squawk about. Washington doesn’t have a revenue problem; the budget is out of balance, creating the deficit, because of a spending problem. This seems to escape the attention of other commentators noted above.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *